Sunday, January 11, 2009

Book Review

We eat food every day but what really in it? In the book Dinner at the New Gene Café by Bill Lambrecht, it explains what food as become after genetic engineering. This book also explains what genetically modified food has done to the farms, the stores, the environment, and it even affected other countries.

A good question to ask is why did he write this book? One good reason why he did was because of his history. He was a journalist for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and as a journalist one has the task to inform people what is happening. He basically wrote this book to inform people about genetic modification of foods. Bill was following this and then for a while he stopped and started writing about other things. “With most of America, I paid little attention when the genetic engineers turned their magic to our daily bread,” said Bill. After that he made this book which was very affective and very informative. He did reach his goal of informing people. The structure also makes it easier to inform people. The book is divided into four parts in which each part is different. For example, one part talks about farming while another talks about genetic engineering in other countries and so on. Another thing about structure is that within the book there are eleven sections that are different from the book. They talk about Bill’s own experiment. The experiment was that he planted genetically modified soy beans and other plants to observe them. That is a different structure from other books but it does help it.

The book starts of by a quick introduction were it explains that most of our food is genetically modified. Then after that it talks about how genetic engineering affects farms and farmers. It talks about how farmers are losing their jobs thanks to the genetic engineered seeds and things like that. A farmer Bill interviewed said this “Did you know that there are more people behind bars in this country than farmers working the land?” Once it is done talking about farms it then talks about genetic engineering in other countries and how some of them started modifying their crops too. The book basically talks about genetic engineering in our food but what makes it real is its credibility. Credibility is essential in books and this book has it. Because the author is a journalist he will work for the real story. The book has a lot of primary sources like interviews and things like that. There are also good reviews out there for the book. The only bad part is that it sounds a little bias against genetically modified foods. Every book has at least one error and that was this book’s.

One of the cool things about this book is that it is write in first person so it sounds like a story. So when he is interviewing a person you actually see yourself in there with them. When he telling his story it was like a mini story in each part of the book. I suggest you read it. I enjoyed the book and it went well with my topic. The only thing was that I wanted to learn more about genetic engineering children but this book did not have it. My favorite part was when Bill interviews the farmer because you learn things about people and the way they react to certain situations. If you want to learn more about what you eat, then you need to read this book. Just keep in mind that we are what we eat.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

poem: Should we do this?

what do you know about biology?

well it deals with societies.

Changing Things

Modifying Things

should we do this?


can we change the way we look?

where is it written in a book?

Who chooses if it is right or wrong?

I do not know but the book will be long

should we do this?


We are messing with our food

which is not necessarily good

messing with Creatures

for no so good features

the question is should we do this?

essay about modifying children

Imagine that you can choose what your baby would look like, what he or she could be good at and even chose its gender. But do you think all this is fair? Genetically modifying children takes away those children’s autonomy, fairness, and individuality and thus should be banned.

Autonomy is the right to self govern according to Wikipedia. So how can we steal this from our children? Well, we have the technology to make children stronger, smarter, better, and even choosing the sex of the child. If a parent decides to makeup the genes of their child the parents would be taking away the chance for the child to pick what he or she would like to be. For example, if we make a child really good at a sport, then it is likely that the parents or the child its self would be pushed to pick that sport instead of choosing what ever they really want to choose. By being pushed and influenced by others the child is losing its autonomy. Another example is that sometimes parents did not become what they wanted to become and sometimes they push their kids to do what they wanted to become, instead of letting them choose what they want. It is very wrong to think or to choose for someone that is not there.

The second question is if all this really fair. One place that this would apply would be in sports. Many athletes would be eager to make them self better and is there a reason to stop them from doing it? The only reason why they should not is because it is unfair and gives an advantage to those who are modified. Another thing is that only rich people would be able to afford this which does not give the poor any chance. Just another example how the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. But its not just sport it is also your intelligence. We can also make us smarter but like the sports, it is expensive. This would mean that only the rich would be the only one that would obtain it and the poor would not. The intelligence can be passed down generations, which in the future there might be to subspecies. We do not want to divide our world more than it already is.

Individuality is the thing that makes you you, but what would have if someone would steal that away from you? When a parent decides to make up a child genetically they are steal away their individuality. They are stealing the part that make them themselves and by modifying the child the parent is making what they want the child to be. In other words they are making their own children. If individuality is lost so is their way of thinking, which means that everyone would think alike and that is not good. Everyone would be a follower and no one would challenge other people’s ideas. We would also lose humanities like art and other things that make us human. Having everyone the same is not a good idea.

So think about whether you would like your kid to be genetically modified. It will help in the short run but destroy us in the long run. No one has the right to steal someone’s autonomy, fairness, and individuality. Being perfect have great consequences.


Sandel, Michael J. "The Case Against Perfection." Atlantic Monthly Apr. 2004: 50-60.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Annotated bibliographies

Kinitz, Edvard. "Why genetic engineering is advantageous for humankind." GEENOR. 19 Nov. 2000, http://www.geneticengineering.org/isgood/default.htm

This article tells what will happen in the future if genetic engineering kept growing. It talks about life in the future and why we need genetic engineering to grow as a society. Also, it says that we could find cures and even genetically modify our food, so that our food can grow faster.

The source is kind of reliable because it does not talk about the author but the guy knows what he is saying. This source is useful if you want to get an idea about what is going to happen in the future. The source is a little bias against religion, which may effect some information. It just wants to inform you.

In the end this source actually did help me. It helped me with prediction I can use for my blog. This source made me think a lot about my topic because I am usually against genetic engineering but this showed me all the benefits of it.

Ballin, Camillo. "Where the Catholic Church Stands on Genetic Issues." Letter to the president. 9 Feb. 2006. http://www.catholic-church.org/kuwait/seminar_cairo.htm

Out of all my sources this one is the only letter. This letter explains the church’s beliefs and what is acceptable to them. The letter is a must read for all Catholics and is recommended to everyone.

The source really helped me with the blog that we needed to write about to different sides. The source did not give me information about my topic but it did give me an opinion about my topic. The letter comes from a bishop which is reliable. It a good source period.

This source did not only help me in my research, it helped me as a person. I indeed am a catholic and I was aware that the church was against it but know I know the reasons why. So I agree with the church that we should not genetic engineer only if it will produce cures for untreatable diseases.

"Pros and cons." Genetic Engineering: the Human's playground. 2004. http://library.thinkquest.org/04apr/00774/en/index.html

This was one of the best sources you can use when you researching this topic. The website has everything you need. It gives little descriptions of history, usage, pros and cons, and many more. This also includes pictures and diagrams showing how everything works. It is the best site to visit when you do not know anything about this topic

When I came across this website I have already learned most of the things they had there so it did not help me out as much as I wanted to. The website is trying to give you the basic information and does a pretty good job at it.

As I have mention before the source did not help me as much as I wanted to because I already knew the background. The only part that did help me was the pros and cons. They did a fine job giving example of each one. It was good information but did not change the way I think about my topic.

"Human Genetic Engineering." All about popular issues. 2002-2008. http://www.allaboutpopularissues.org/human-genetic-engineering.htm

The article is separated into four parts. The first part is a quick overview on genetic engineering and how it had become go big in the last few years. After first one it talks about genetic engineering and the government. The third one is explaining the problems with genetic engineering and the last part is their own opinion on the topic.

The source helped in the part of the problem and the government and rest I already knew so it was not that helpful. This, like most of my source, is an article but the bad thing about this is that it is bias towards the church. Other than that it is a good source.

This source really helped me. Not many articles talked about the government in genetic engineering but this one did. The source is bias towards the church but the letter helped me understand it more.

"Human Genetics Research." All about popular issues. 2002-2008. http://www.allaboutpopularissues.org/human-genetics-research-faq.htm

This article is talking about the ethical issues genetic engineering will bring. The article also explains what the church does not permit. If someone asked about this article I would say it is a good article if you find genetic engineering to be ethically wrong.

The source was pretty helpful because it gave a side of my topic. Other sources give more than one side but this source does not. Due to the fact that the article was made by the church, the source is bias. Another thing about the source is that it is trying to convince you that genetic engineering is unethical.

The article helped me a little because I have already read the other source about the church and genetics. I use the parts that were not in the letter in my blogs. One thing that I did get out of this is the moral reasons why we should not genetic engineer.

"FDA to review genetically engineered animals as food." Chron. 18 Sept. 2008. 20 Sept. 2008 . http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26773327/

This article helped me the most out of all the rest. It talks about genetically engineered animals as food. This also says that the government will not label this meat and that it is safe to eat. I would say that every person should read this because the saying goes “you are what you eat.”

The article was so much different from the others because it is one of the few that talks about genetic modified foods. This article wants to inform people what the government is doing and that we should as lest try to stop them or make it public.

The article was so good that it even helped me. Now I am more aware what is happening in the meat world. I have used this in a lot of different blogs. Some of genetic engineering is good but I do not want them messing with what I eat.

Monday, November 24, 2008

Letter to the people that shop

Dear Shoppers,

Before you get that piece of meat take a minute to think where it really came from and if it was the real animal or just something engineered by humans. Many people just get what they want without actually knowing what it really is. That’s why I am writing to you today shopper, so you can start thinking what you are actually eating. Many people say” you are what you eat” so what are we?

Today many of our meats and other foods are genetically engineered. This means that you might think that you are eating beef but in reality you are eating beef with pig gene in it. Is that what you would like? I personally would not. People need to be aware what they are eating since most of the general store is constituted of genetically modified food. The FDA recently said that more genetically modified food would be in the market. The bad news is that that meat will not be labeled. So how is person going to know if it is modified? One way you can prevent that is by buying organic meats and cheese. This is degenerating our way of living and it should be changed.

I hope now most shoppers will open up their eyes to the truth and realize what they are eating. We have messed with our food source, how will that affect us in the future? We still do not know but when that day comes it might be too late.

Sincerely,

Alan Felix

Friday, November 21, 2008

Graph

Key: The spares is the people that think that both benefits and harmful effects are equal. The triangle are the people that the harmful results will outweigh the benefits of genetic engineering. The diamonds are the people that think that the benefits will out weigh the harmful results.


Most people would think that it would be easy to find a graph for my topic but it was really hard. The only one I found is a little old and I bet that the data has changed in the years. The graph shows what people think about genetic engineering. From 1985-2001 is the years that they got this data. This graph shows the way people change their mind over years. In 1985 46% of the people in the US believed that the benefits of genetic engineering were more important than the harmful results. In 2001, that percentage dropped to 40%. People that thought that the harmful results were more important only made a 38% and after 16 years it dropped to 33%. The only one that when up was the people that thought that both benefits and harmful effects were equal. One thing I didn’t know was that more people think that the benefits will outweigh the harmful effects. The data is somewhat reliable since it came for a college. This data is important because you can look were people stand on this topic. It was very interesting to see this.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

The new article

As I was looking though articles I stubbed across The Boston Globe. In there I found an article called “Gene-altered animals and food safety,” by Rick Weiss. This article talks about what is happening recently in the genetic engineering world. Thanks to the recession many people were not informed about this.

The article starts of by talking about food. As many people already know some of our meats, milk, and cheese come from cloned cows or from their babies. In January the FDA said cloned meat was safe to eat. Now recently the FDA also said that genetically modified animals can also be sold in the market. Would you like a genetically modify steak for dinner? I personally would not. They have added genes in salmon so it can grow faster. Also, they have added a bacterial gene in pigs so they can be a little more environmentally friendly. In cows they have added fish genes to get omega-3 fatty acids. A good hypothetical question Rick asked was “what happens when gene-enhanced salmon escape their offshore cages and mate with their wild cousins?” We may not find out but in all this there is good news. The FDA has strict rules and restriction for the genetically modified food to get to the market. The bad news is that if it approved most details and data will be hidden. They call this “confidential business information.” I mean we all do not know about genetically modified foods and we need information. One thing the FDA can improve on is labeling the modified foods and posting information. Like Rick Weiss said in this article “The United States needs a system for approving some gene-altered animals.”

This article helps you realize all the things the government does behind our back and we do not even know it. I have even learned things that I did not know. For example, I did not know that now it is permitted to sell modified foods. Where has this world gone to?